Vaccine Against Cervical Cancer – Concerns grow over the long term effects of vaccines antipapillomavirus for teenagers. A girl is vaccinated against human papillomavirus to Dallas in 2007.This week, we heard a lot about vaccines,. But few of Gardasil, the vaccine should protect against cancer of the cervix in which the growing concern abroad.
In 2008, Gardasil, produced in Europe by Sanofi Pasteur MSD, and its competitor Cervarix (produced by GlaxoSmithKline, which holds a minor share of the market), cost 146 million euros for health insurance for $ 1.65 million vaccinations . According to several foreign research organizations, its long-term benefits have not yet demonstrated. An association of U.S. consumers even denounces significant side effects. A visitor alerted us to this.
Sanofi Pasteur MSD has created a site “educational” aptly called “pass the info” with sound and video. Pretty women and girls make you want to be vaccinated in the second. Irresistible spot past the French TV during the placing on the market in 2007, explaining to mothers that if they “care about the future of their daughter, they can protect them from the age of 14 years against some virus transmitted by sexual contact with Gardasil.
Asked about the doubts surrounding Gardasil, the marketing company responded is pleased to respond:
“It is not marketing, but advertising for a vaccine recommended by the government, distributed in 104 countries and with no severe adverse effect was demonstrated. ”
Booklets distributed in pharmacies and reproduced on the promotional site of Gardasil stress on the progression of cervical cancer of the uterus: in 2005 more than 3,000 new cases per year have been detected and is the second most common cancer among women under 44 years.
The communication is organized so that the public tends to remember that Gardasil protects against cervical cancer. In fact, it protects against four types of human papillomavirus involved in 70% of these cancers. If, as stated in the promotional site of the vaccine, almost 70% of women are infected with human papillomavirus during their lives, very few of them develop this cancer and the vaccine does not protect against injuries existing. The smear is not it more effective to fight against cervical cancer?
Martin Winckler, physician and writer, notes that in Scandinavia, where the smear is mandatory, cancer of the cervix uteri has virtually disappeared. The author of La Maladie de Sachs calls into question the “important medical service” that Gardasil is supposed to make the sheet as “good use of the drug” published by the High Authority of Health:
“We make Gardasil as a public health issue is heinous. This would be true if it was a very common cancer and there was no other way to prevent it. Now there are only 1500 deaths per year associated with this cancer. ”
Certainly, all documents released to the public following the recommendation of the AFSSAPS, the French agency for safety of health products, that we must continue to detect cervical cancer smear. But information goes obviously wrong. What regrets Martin Winckler:
“All the money spent on this vaccine is not made in the
Awareness smear. Only 50% of women are screened regularly, mainly because too few GPs practice smear. ”
What is known about side effects?
In February, two Spanish girls have lost consciousness shortly after receiving an injection of Gardasil. Afssaps concluded that a relationship of cause and effect with vaccination was “very unlikely” and recommended the continuation of the vaccination. In Spain, a petition requesting a moratorium on the use of Gardasil in the name of defending the public good “has collected 8745 signatures.
A American Association has also requested an investigation by the Department of Health. Because the case is growing in the United States, where a family suggests that 29 unexplained deaths were attributable to Gardasil and the parents of alleged victims organized. The short film released by the Institute of Medical Sciences Baltimore relays these fears.